|
News Flash
|
|

July 22.2004
THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS' SAFETY ACT
SIGNED INTO LAW BY PRESIDENT BUSH!
Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Grand Lodge, Fraternal
Order of Police, proudly announced that President George W. Bush
signed H.R. 218,
the :Law Enforcement Officers' Safety Act" into law
earlier today.
"Today's triumph was the result of a long, hard-fought battle,"
Canterbury said. "The Fraternal Order of Police has been working
toward this day for over ten years. With the stroke of his pen, the
President has made real the hopes of law enforcement officers across
the nation."
The legislation, sponsored by Representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham
(R-CA), was passed by the House in June, and then by the Senate
earlier this month. It exempts
qualified active and retired law enforcement officers from State and
local prohibitions with respect to the carrying of concealed firearms.
Canterbury and F.O.P. Executive Director Jim Pasco were the only law
enforcement representatives to meet with the President in the Oval
Office before the bill signing. "The President has truly made this
country a safer place," said Canterbury after the ceremony. "By
enacting this legislation, President Bush has ensured that when
officers are confronted with a situation to which they must react,
they have the tools necessary to ensure their own safety, and the
safety of their families and the public they have been sworn to
protect."
Now that the measure has been signed
into law, active and retired law enforcement officers will be able to
carry their firearms even when traveling outside their own
jurisdictions. The bill, which was the F.O.P.'s top
legislative priority, had wide, bipartisan support in both the House
and Senate during its consideration in the Congress.

July 25, 2004
H.R.218: The Law Enforcement
Officers Safety Act of 2004
An Act
To amend title 18, United States Code, to
exempt qualified current and former law enforcement officers from
State laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed handguns.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Law Enforcement
Officers Safety Act of 2004'.
SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF QUALIFIED LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FROM STATE LAWS PROHIBITING THE CARRYING OF
CONCEALED FIREARMS.
(a) In General- Chapter 44 of title 18, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 926A the following:
`Sec. 926B. Carrying of concealed firearms by
qualified law enforcement officers
`(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of
the law of any State or any political subdivision thereof, an
individual who is a qualified law enforcement officer and who is
carrying the identification required by subsection (d) may carry a
concealed firearm that has been shipped or transported in interstate
or foreign commerce, subject to subsection (b).
`(b) This section shall not be construed to
supersede or limit the laws of any State that--
`(1) permit private persons or entities to
prohibit or restrict the possession of concealed firearms on their
property; or
`(2) prohibit or restrict the possession
of firearms on any State or local government property,
installation, building, base, or park.
`(c) As used in this section, the term
`qualified law enforcement officer' means an employee of a
governmental agency who--
`(1) is authorized by law to engage in or
supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution
of, or the incarceration of any person for, any violation of law,
and has statutory powers of arrest;
`(2) is authorized by the agency to carry
a firearm;
`(3) is not the subject of any
disciplinary action by the agency;
`(4) meets standards, if any, established
by the agency which require the employee to regularly qualify in
the use of a firearm;
`(5) is not under the influence of alcohol
or another intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance; and
`(6) is not prohibited by Federal law from
receiving a firearm.
`(d) The identification required by this
subsection is the photographic identification issued by the
governmental agency for which the individual is employed as a law
enforcement officer.
`(e) As used in this section, the term
`firearm' does not include--
`(1) any machinegun (as defined in section
5845 of the National Firearms Act);
`(2) any firearm silencer (as defined in
section 921 of this title); and
`(3) any destructive device (as defined in
section 921 of this title).'.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections
for such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to
section 926A the following:
`926B. Carrying of concealed firearms by
qualified law enforcement officers.'.
SEC. 3. EXEMPTION OF
QUALIFIED RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
FROM STATE LAWS PROHIBITING THE CARRYING OF CONCEALED FIREARMS.
(a) In General- Chapter 44 of title 18, United
States Code, is further amended by inserting after section 926B the
following:
`Sec. 926C. Carrying of concealed firearms by
qualified retired law enforcement officers
`(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of
the law of any State or any political subdivision thereof,
an individual
who is a qualified retired law enforcement officer and who is
carrying the identification required by subsection (d) may carry a
concealed firearm that has been shipped or transported in
interstate or foreign commerce, subject to subsection (b).
`(b) This section shall not be construed to
supersede or limit the laws of any State that--
`(1) permit private persons or entities to
prohibit or restrict the possession of concealed firearms on their
property; or
`(2) prohibit or restrict the possession
of firearms on any State or local government property,
installation, building, base, or park.
`(c) As used in this section, the term
`qualified retired law enforcement officer'
means an individual who--
`(1) retired in good
standing from service with a public agency as a law enforcement
officer, other than for reasons of mental instability;
`(2) before such
retirement, was authorized by law to engage in or supervise the
prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of, or the
incarceration of any person for, any violation of law, and had
statutory powers of arrest;
`(3)(A) before such
retirement, was regularly employed as a law enforcement officer
for an aggregate of 15 years or more; or
`(B) retired from
service with such agency, after completing any applicable
probationary period of such service, due to a service-connected
disability, as determined by such agency;
`(4) has a
non-forfeitable right to benefits under the retirement plan of the
agency;
`(5) during the most
recent 12-month period, has met, at the expense of the individual,
the State's standards for training and qualification for active
law enforcement officers to carry firearms;
`(6) is not under
the influence of alcohol or another intoxicating or hallucinatory
drug or substance; and
`(7) is not
prohibited by Federal law from receiving a firearm.
`(d) The
identification required by this subsection is--
`(1) a photographic
identification issued by the agency from which the individual
retired from service as a law enforcement officer that indicates
that the individual has, not less recently than one year before
the date the individual is carrying the concealed firearm, been
tested or otherwise found by the agency to meet the standards
established by the agency for training and qualification for
active law enforcement officers to carry a firearm of the same
type as the concealed firearm; or
`(2)(A) a
photographic identification issued by the agency from which the
individual retired from service as a law enforcement officer; and
`(B) a certification
issued by the State in which the individual resides that indicates
that the individual has, not less recently than one year before
the date the individual is carrying the concealed firearm, been
tested or otherwise found by the State to meet the standards
established by the State for training and qualification for active
law enforcement officers to carry a firearm of the same type as
the concealed firearm.
`(e) As used in this section, the term
`firearm' does not include--
`(1) any machinegun (as defined in section
5845 of the National Firearms Act);
`(2) any firearm silencer (as defined in
section 921 of this title); and
`(3) a destructive device (as defined in
section 921 of this title).'.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections
for such chapter is further amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 926B the following:
`926C. Carrying of concealed firearms by
qualified retired law enforcement officers.'.
Speaker of the House of
Representatives.
Vice President of the United
States and President of the Senate.


July 24, 2004
F.O.P. President
Testifies before
Social Security
Subcommittee
Canterbury
Calls on Congress to Repeal the WEP Benefit Cuts
Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police,
testified this morning before the House Subcommittee on Social
Security in favor of H.R. 4391, the “Public Servant Retirement
Protection Act,” which would repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision
(WEP) and replace it with a more equitable, individualized calculation
of Social Security benefits.
“The WEP is an arbitrary and inequitable formula and it has been a top
legislative priority of the F.O.P. to repeal this provision of Social
Security law for some time now,” said Canterbury. “Ultimately, this
issue is about fairness to the State and local employees who paid for
and ought to receive their full Social Security benefit. This
legislation is a positive first step toward that goal.”
The “Public Servant Retirement Protection Act” was introduced by
Representative Kevin P. Brady (R TX), along with Representatives E.
Clay Shaw, Jr. (R FL), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Social
Security, Howard L. Berman (D CA), Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R CA), Sam
Johnson (R TX), and Michael Michaud (D ME). The legislation would
repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and replace it with an
individualized calculation of Social Security worker benefits based on
an individual’s entire work history. Under the legislation, Social
Security benefits would be calculated as if all the worker’s earnings
were subject to Social Security taxes, using the standard benefit
formula. To ensure Social Security benefits are based only on Social
Security wages, the benefit would be multiplied by the percent of
earnings subject to Social Security taxes.
“I think it is clear that Congress did not intend to reduce the
benefits of hard-working Americans who chose to serve their States and
communities as public employees and then went on to have second
careers or worked second jobs to make ends meet,” Canterbury said,
referring to the WEP, which affects approximately seven (7) million
public employees that are outside the Social Security system. “This
legislation treats our nation’s public employees much more fairly and
the Fraternal Order of Police is proud to offer the measure its
support.”
The Fraternal Order of Police is the largest law enforcement labor
organization in the United States, with more than 318,000 members.
Chris L. Granberg
Senior Legislative Liaison
Fraternal Order of Police
National Legislative Office
309 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
(O) (202) 547 - 8189
(F) (202) 547 - 8190
grandlodgefop.org

July 23, 2004
H.R. 4391, the “Public Servant Retirement Protection Act”:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2004, National President Chuck Canterbury
testified in support of H.R. 4391, the “Public Servant Retirement
Protection Act,” before the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on
Social Security-- the third time this Congress that the F.O.P. has
testified before Congress on Social Security reform. The F.O.P. has
endorsed H.R. 4391 and its Senate companion bill, S. 2455, introduced
by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX).
The legislation would repeal the Windfall
Elimination Provision (WEP) and replace it with an individualized
calculation of Social Security worker benefits based on an
individual's entire work history. Under the legislation, Social
Security benefits would be calculated as if all the worker's earnings
were subject to Social Security taxes, using the standard benefit
formula. To ensure Social Security benefits are based only on Social
Security wages, the benefit would be multiplied by the percent of
earnings subject to Social Security taxes. Current retirees and
workers who have non-Social Security wages in or before the year
following enactment will receive the higher of either their benefit
under current law or their benefit calculated under this bill. The
legislation does not make any changes to the GPO.

July 12, 2004
Senator Carper's response letter
to passing H.R. 218
FYI... This is a letter of response to my urging
Senator's Carper, Biden and Representative Castle to support the H.R.
218, the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, that would allow Active
Police Officers and qualified Retired Police Officers in good standing,
to carry concealed weapons anywhere in the US.
This is Sen. Carper's letter to me......
July 12, 2004
Mr. Michael Riley
Wilmington, Delaware 19808
Thank you for contacting my office to express
your continued
support for H.R. 218, the Law Enforcement
Officers Safety Act.
As a cosponsor of the Law Enforcement Officers
Safety Act, I am
pleased to let you know that the Senate
unanimously approved
I have a great deal of admiration and
appreciation for law
enforcement personnel. My father worked most of
his life as a
claims adjuster for Nationwide Insurance, and he
had the
opportunity to interact with law enforcement
officers throughout
his career in the insurance industry. During
that time, he gained a
great deal of respect for those men and women
who were willing to
risk their lives every day for their fellow
citizens. Having an
appreciation for law enforcement is just one of
my father's values
that I carry with me to this day.
Having said that, I am pleased to report that
the Senate
unanimously approved H.R. 218, the Law
Enforcement Officers
Safety Act, on July 7th. As you know, H.R. 218
will exempt off-
duty and retired law enforcement officials from
state laws
prohibiting concealed weapons. In order to
qualify to carry
concealed weapons, officers will have to
maintain firearms training
and carry proof of affiliation with a law
enforcement agency.
Moreover, the legislation will require retired
law enforcement
personnel to meet standards for carrying guns
within the past year.
President Bush has indicated that he will sign
the Law
Enforcement Officers Safety Act in the near
future.
I have been a strong supporter of the Law
Enforcement Officers
Safety Act since its introduction at the
beginning of the 108th
Congress. I cosponsored the Senate version of
the legislation,
S.253, and voted for it as an amendment to a
subsequently defeated
Senate gun liability bill. It is clear to me
that the measure will
enable more trained law enforcement officers to
enforce the law
and respond to any crisis. It will also
undoubtedly help our nation
guard against the threat of terrorism.
As one who has a great deal of respect for our
law enforcement
personnel, I know that current and former police
officers are rarely,
if ever, "off duty". The Law Enforcement
Officers Safety Act is a
common sense initiative that will simply make
our communities
safer. Ultimately, the federal government has a
responsibility to
continue to give law enforcement officials the
tools they need to
Thank you again for contacting my
office. Please do not hesitate
to contact me in the future about matters of
importance to you.
With best personal regards, I am
Sincerely,
Thomas R. Carper


DELAWARE FOP
LICENSE PLATES AVAILABLE
Delaware's Division of Motor Vehicles
has the below listed Specialty Plate Numbers available to register.
Please obtain a form
and along with your check made out to
DELAWARE STATE FOP
$25.00 for the first tag ($10.00 for each
additional tag)
All of these forms must be submit
through your FOP Lodge Trustee
( for verification of being in good standing),
Your Lodge Trustee will then forward the form
to
DELAWARE STATE LODGE
FRATERNAL ORDER OF
POLICE

Office of the
Secretary
324 5th Ave
Wilmington, DE
19805
fop@allanticbb.net
-
The FOP member must have
his/her name on the title.
-
Specialty Plates are only
given to those vehicles with "hard metal" tags. Cardboard TEMP tags will not
be accepted, so wait until you get your hard tags issued to you before
applying.
-
It is recommended that an
applicant pick three desired numbers in case one is being processed for
someone else.
-
The Delaware State Lodge
Secretary shall only issue a Delaware FOP tag application if that member
pays membership dues to a local Delaware lodge.
-
If the member leaves the
Order, the FOP Specialty tag must be surrendered to DMV.
-
Delaware Law states that
a vehicle may display only one Vanity Tag on a vehicle. (For example, you
cannot have a FOP Special Tag and a U. of Del. Special Tag on the same
vehicle)
The following plate numbers are presently available:
|
267-299--315-325-412-438-454 -456 -458-461 -470 - 474-486- -
503 - 507 - 508 - 509 -514-516-- 519 - 523 - 526 - 527 - 530 - 531 - 532
- 537 - 538 - 539 - 540 - 542 - 545 - 546 - 547 - 548 - 549 -553-556 -
557 - 558-559 - 561 - 563 - 564 - 565 - 566 - 568 - 571 - 572 - 575 - 576 - 577 - 578 - 579 - 580 - 581 - 582
- 583 - 584 - 590 - 591 - 592 - 593 - 594 - 596 - 597 - 598
- 599 - - 604 - 606 - 608 - 609 - 610 - 613 - 615 - 616 - 618 -- 627-634- - 628 -636- 637 - 638 - 639 - 640 - 641 - 642 -644- 645 -
646 - 647 - 648 - 649 - 650 - 651 - 652 - 653 - 654 - 655 - 656 -- 659 -
660 - 661 - 662 - 663 - 664 - 665 -667- 670 - 671 - 672 -
674 - 675 -- 677 - 678 - 680 - 681 - 682 - 683 - 684 - 685 - 686 -
687 - 688 - 689 - 693 --695 - 698 - 699 -700-706- 708 - 709 - 712 - 713 -
715 -717- 718 - 719 - 720 - 721 - 723 - 725 - 727 - 729 - 730 - 732 -
733 - 734 - 735 - 736 - 737 - 739 - 740 - 741 - 742 - 743 - 744 - 745 -
746 - 749 - 750 - 751 - 752 - 753 - 754 - 755 - 756 - 757 - 758 - 759 -
760 - 761 - 762 - 763 - 764 - 766 - 767 - 768 - 771 - 772 - 775-776 - 778 -
780 - 781 - 782 - 783 - 784 - 786 - 787 - 788 - 789 - 790 - 791 - 792 -
793 - 794 - 795 - 796 - 797 - 798 - 799 - 804 - 805 - 806 - 808 - 809 -
810 - 811 - 812 - 814 - 815 - 816 -- 818 - 819 - 820 -824 - 825 - 827 -
828 - 829 - 830 - 831 - 832 - 833 - 834 - 835 - 836 - 837 - 840 - 841 -
842 - 843 - 844 - 845 - 846 - 847 - 848 - 849 - 851 - 852 - 853 - 854 -
855 - 857 - 858 - 859 - 860 - 861 - 862 - 863 -865 - 866 - 867 -
870 - 871 - 872 - 873 - 874 - 875 - 876 - 877- 878 -
880 - 882 - 883 - 884 - 885 - 886 -887- 890 - - 895 - 896 - 897
-898-899-- 902 - 903 - 904 - 906 -
908 - 909 - 912-913 - 916 -- 922 - 925-930-931 - 932 - 933 - 934 - 935 -
937 - 938 - 939 - 943 - 944 - 945 - 946 - 947 - 948 - 949 -
950 - 954 - 955 - 964 - 965 - 966 - 967 - 968 -
969 - 970 - 972 - 973 - 974 - 976 -- 978 - 979 -980- 981 - 982 - 983 -
985 - 986 - 987 - 988 - 990 - 991 - 992 - 995 - 996-997
|

NEWS FLASH - JULY 1ST, 2003
Local State of
Delaware issue
The General Assembly finished their session in the early hours of July
1st, 2003. The State Lodge Legislative Committee was there, working for
the membership. Spearheaded by Legislative Chairman Larry Mitchell and
joined by brother's Bill Jopp, Carl McIlroy and myself, the State Lodge
had House Bill 283 passed in the Senate and sent to the
Governor. This bill removes the sunset provision from the Binding
Arbitration Act (March 31st, 2004).
This bill was just introduced in the House on June 26th, passed that same
day and forwarded to the Senate. The speed in which this was
accomplished caught our opponents off guard, and prevented them from
mounting any opposition.
Another important piece of legislation accomplished was the
Tuition/Technology Funding in the Bond Bill (HB 300). The
language from our bill was included in the Bond Bill and a million dollars
was allocated ($900k for tech. and $100k for tuition reimbursement).
This concludes a five year effort by Brother Mitchell and myself,
along with others from the State Lodge, to secure some type of tuition
assistance for our membership. I am very thankful to the Honorable
Representative Bill Oberle for his leadership on both these issues. Once
again, Brother Oberle led the way.
Bob Jameson
State Lodge President
Education Reimbursement Guidelines
1. Must
be certified as a police officer or other law enforcement officer as
defined in Del.C.1911(a) or a State of Delaware Probation and Parole
Officer employed by the Department of Corrections.
-
Must be employed full time in the State
of Delaware.
-
Reimbursement will be made for the cost
of tuition to an in state college or university at the following rate:
·
100% for undergraduate
studies
·
50% for graduate studies
4. Approved courses of study shall be
classes related to the following:
·
Corrections
·
Public Safety
·
Criminal Justice
·
Computer Science
·
Psychology
·
Sociology
·
Education
·
Those courses necessary to
complete a degree program in any of the above mentioned fields
5. Reimbursement will be limited to one
(1) class per term/grading period
-
The Criminal Justice Council will accept
“letters of intent to enroll” from officers on the following dates:
-
July 15 – August 15 for all Fall Term
-
November 15 – December 15 for the
Winter or Spring Term
-
April 15 – May 15 for the Summer Term
The letters should identify the class that
will be taken and the cost of the class. Letters will be accepted on a
“first come, first served” basis and will continue to be accepted
until all of the allotted funds are obligated.
Officers will receive
notification of their acceptance or denial due to lack of funds.
An Officer who is denied reimbursement due to lack of funds
will have his letter remain on file with the Criminal Justice Council in
the event that funds do become available.
An officer who is approved for
reimbursement shall notify the Criminal Justice Council in the event of
his/her decision not to enroll in the class or their early termination.
7. Once
the course is completed, the officer will file an Application for
Reimbursement form with the Criminal Justice Council and attach a copy of
the receipt for payment of tuition and a copy of his/her transcript
documenting his/her having received a grade of at least C or a 2.0 on a
4.0 scale for the course for which he/she is seeking reimbursement.
-
The request for reimbursement shall be
filed within thirty (30) days of completion of the course
-
An officer who is denied reimbursement
shall have the right to appeal. The appeal will be filed within thirty
(30) days of denial of the reimbursement to the Law Enforcement
Education Committee. There can be no appeal on the denial of benefits
due to lack of funds.
-
Any officer who is terminated from law
enforcement employment and who has previously received reimbursement
within the last twelve (12) months shall immediately become ineligible
to receive education benefits and shall repay all tuition reimbursements
previously extended to the employee, including interest on a pro-rata
basis. The Attorney General’s Office shall calculate the amount of repay
and make the arrangement for repayment. Policies regarding termination,
resignation, retirement and re-certification of the Council of Police
Training will serve as guidelines in determining repayment.
-
A committee, hereinafter referred to as
the Law Enforcement Education Committee, will serve as an appeals board
and to address and all issues regarding the Law Enforcement Education
Reimbursement Fund that are yet to be identified. The committee shall
consist of the following:
-
Executive Director of the Criminal
Justice Council or his/her designee
-
Chairman of the Delaware Police
Chief’s Council or his/her designee
-
President of the Fraternal Order of
Police or his/her designee
-
President of the Delaware State
Trooper’s Association or his/her designee
-
A representative from the State Budget
Office
The Secretary of the
State Department of Education or his/her designee

Social Security Issues:
We, the members of the Fraternal Order of Police, local
and National Lodges, support:
#1 H.R.
594/S. 349, the "Social Security Fairness Act"
- Repeals both the "Windfall
Elimination Provision" (WEP)
and the "Government Pension Offset" (GPO).
#2 H.R.
664/S. 611, the "Government Pension Offset Reform Act" - Which would
amend the GPO provision in current law.
#3 H.R. 848, the "Social
Security Benefits Restoration Act"
- Would repeal the
“Windfall Elimination Provision”
#4
H.R. 4391, “Public Servant Retirement Protection Act,” This would
repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and replace it with a more
equitable, individualized calculation of Social Security benefits.
*
|