Delaware State Lodge

 Elected Officers     Trustees      Calendar     Events    News Flash     Good of the Order     Local Lodges

 

 News Flash

 

 

 

 

 

July 22.2004

THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS' SAFETY ACT
SIGNED INTO LAW BY PRESIDENT BUSH!
 

Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Grand Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police, proudly announced that President George W. Bush signed H.R. 218,

the :Law Enforcement Officers' Safety Act" into law earlier today. 

"Today's triumph was the result of a long, hard-fought battle," Canterbury said. "The Fraternal Order of Police has been working toward this day for over ten years.  With the stroke of his pen, the President has made real the hopes of law enforcement officers across the nation." 

The legislation, sponsored by Representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-CA), was passed by the House in June, and then by the Senate earlier this month.  It exempts qualified active and retired law enforcement officers from State and local prohibitions with respect to the carrying of concealed firearms.

Canterbury and F.O.P. Executive Director Jim Pasco were the only law enforcement representatives to meet with the President in the Oval Office before the bill signing.  "The President has truly made this country a safer place," said Canterbury after the ceremony.  "By enacting this legislation, President Bush has ensured that when officers are confronted with a situation to which they must react, they have the tools necessary to ensure their own safety, and the safety of their families and the public they have been sworn to protect."

Now that the measure has been signed into law, active and retired law enforcement officers will be able to carry their firearms even when traveling outside their own jurisdictions.  The bill, which was the F.O.P.'s top legislative priority, had wide, bipartisan support in both the House and Senate during its consideration in the Congress.

July 25, 2004

H.R.218: The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
 

An Act

To amend title 18, United States Code, to exempt qualified current and former law enforcement officers from State laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed handguns.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004'.

 

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF QUALIFIED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FROM STATE LAWS PROHIBITING THE CARRYING OF CONCEALED FIREARMS.

(a) In General- Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 926A the following:

`Sec. 926B. Carrying of concealed firearms by qualified law enforcement officers

`(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State or any political subdivision thereof, an individual who is a qualified law enforcement officer and who is carrying the identification required by subsection (d) may carry a concealed firearm that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, subject to subsection (b).

`(b) This section shall not be construed to supersede or limit the laws of any State that--

`(1) permit private persons or entities to prohibit or restrict the possession of concealed firearms on their property; or

`(2) prohibit or restrict the possession of firearms on any State or local government property, installation, building, base, or park.

`(c) As used in this section, the term `qualified law enforcement officer' means an employee of a governmental agency who--

`(1) is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of, or the incarceration of any person for, any violation of law, and has statutory powers of arrest;

`(2) is authorized by the agency to carry a firearm;

`(3) is not the subject of any disciplinary action by the agency;

`(4) meets standards, if any, established by the agency which require the employee to regularly qualify in the use of a firearm;

`(5) is not under the influence of alcohol or another intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance; and

`(6) is not prohibited by Federal law from receiving a firearm.

`(d) The identification required by this subsection is the photographic identification issued by the governmental agency for which the individual is employed as a law enforcement officer.

`(e) As used in this section, the term `firearm' does not include--

`(1) any machinegun (as defined in section 5845 of the National Firearms Act);

`(2) any firearm silencer (as defined in section 921 of this title); and

`(3) any destructive device (as defined in section 921 of this title).'.

(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections for such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 926A the following:

`926B. Carrying of concealed firearms by qualified law enforcement officers.'.

 

SEC. 3. EXEMPTION OF QUALIFIED RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FROM STATE LAWS PROHIBITING THE CARRYING OF CONCEALED FIREARMS.

(a) In General- Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is further amended by inserting after section 926B the following:

`Sec. 926C. Carrying of concealed firearms by qualified retired law enforcement officers

`(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State or any political subdivision thereof, an individual who is a qualified retired law enforcement officer and who is carrying the identification required by subsection (d) may carry a concealed firearm that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, subject to subsection (b).

`(b) This section shall not be construed to supersede or limit the laws of any State that--

`(1) permit private persons or entities to prohibit or restrict the possession of concealed firearms on their property; or

`(2) prohibit or restrict the possession of firearms on any State or local government property, installation, building, base, or park.

`(c) As used in this section, the term `qualified retired law enforcement officer' means an individual who--

`(1) retired in good standing from service with a public agency as a law enforcement officer, other than for reasons of mental instability;

`(2) before such retirement, was authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of, or the incarceration of any person for, any violation of law, and had statutory powers of arrest;

`(3)(A) before such retirement, was regularly employed as a law enforcement officer for an aggregate of 15 years or more; or

`(B) retired from service with such agency, after completing any applicable probationary period of such service, due to a service-connected disability, as determined by such agency;

`(4) has a non-forfeitable right to benefits under the retirement plan of the agency;

`(5) during the most recent 12-month period, has met, at the expense of the individual, the State's standards for training and qualification for active law enforcement officers to carry firearms;

`(6) is not under the influence of alcohol or another intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance; and

`(7) is not prohibited by Federal law from receiving a firearm.

`(d) The identification required by this subsection is--

`(1) a photographic identification issued by the agency from which the individual retired from service as a law enforcement officer that indicates that the individual has, not less recently than one year before the date the individual is carrying the concealed firearm, been tested or otherwise found by the agency to meet the standards established by the agency for training and qualification for active law enforcement officers to carry a firearm of the same type as the concealed firearm; or

`(2)(A) a photographic identification issued by the agency from which the individual retired from service as a law enforcement officer; and

`(B) a certification issued by the State in which the individual resides that indicates that the individual has, not less recently than one year before the date the individual is carrying the concealed firearm, been tested or otherwise found by the State to meet the standards established by the State for training and qualification for active law enforcement officers to carry a firearm of the same type as the concealed firearm.

`(e) As used in this section, the term `firearm' does not include--

`(1) any machinegun (as defined in section 5845 of the National Firearms Act);

`(2) any firearm silencer (as defined in section 921 of this title); and

`(3) a destructive device (as defined in section 921 of this title).'.

(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections for such chapter is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 926B the following:

`926C. Carrying of concealed firearms by qualified retired law enforcement officers.'.

 

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.

July 24, 2004

F.O.P. President Testifies before
Social Security Subcommittee
Canterbury Calls on Congress to Repeal the WEP Benefit Cuts
 

 
Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police, testified this morning before the House Subcommittee on Social Security in favor of H.R. 4391, the “Public Servant Retirement Protection Act,” which would repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and replace it with a more equitable, individualized calculation of Social Security benefits.
 
“The WEP is an arbitrary and inequitable formula and it has been a top legislative priority of the F.O.P. to repeal this provision of Social Security law for some time now,” said Canterbury.  “Ultimately, this issue is about fairness to the State and local employees who paid for and ought to receive their full Social Security benefit.  This legislation is a positive first step toward that goal.”
 
The “Public Servant Retirement Protection Act” was introduced by Representative Kevin P. Brady (R TX), along with Representatives E. Clay Shaw, Jr. (R FL), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Social Security, Howard L. Berman (D CA), Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R CA), Sam Johnson (R TX), and Michael Michaud (D ME). The legislation would repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and replace it with an individualized calculation of Social Security worker benefits based on an individual’s entire work history.  Under the legislation, Social Security benefits would be calculated as if all the worker’s earnings were subject to Social Security taxes, using the standard benefit formula.  To ensure Social Security benefits are based only on Social Security wages, the benefit would be multiplied by the percent of earnings subject to Social Security taxes.
 
“I think it is clear that Congress did not intend to reduce the benefits of hard-working Americans who chose to serve their States and communities as public employees and then went on to have second careers or worked second jobs to make ends meet,” Canterbury said, referring to the WEP, which affects approximately seven (7) million public employees that are outside the Social Security system.  “This legislation treats our nation’s public employees much more fairly and the Fraternal Order of Police is proud to offer the measure its support.”
 
The Fraternal Order of Police is the largest law enforcement labor organization in the United States, with more than 318,000 members.

Chris L. Granberg
Senior Legislative Liaison
                                
Fraternal Order of Police
National Legislative Office
309 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC  20002
(O) (202) 547 - 8189
(F) (202) 547 - 8190

grandlodgefop.org

July 23, 2004

H.R. 4391, the “Public Servant Retirement Protection Act”:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2004, National President Chuck Canterbury testified in support of H.R. 4391, the “Public Servant Retirement Protection Act,” before the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Social Security-- the third time this Congress that the F.O.P. has testified before Congress on Social Security reform.  The F.O.P. has endorsed H.R. 4391 and its Senate companion bill, S. 2455, introduced by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX). 
 
The legislation would repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and replace it with an individualized calculation of Social Security worker benefits based on an individual's entire work history.  Under the legislation, Social Security benefits would be calculated as if all the worker's earnings were subject to Social Security taxes, using the standard benefit formula.  To ensure Social Security benefits are based only on Social Security wages, the benefit would be multiplied by the percent of earnings subject to Social Security taxes.  Current retirees and workers who have non-Social Security wages in or before the year following enactment will receive the higher of either their benefit under current law or their benefit calculated under this bill.  The legislation does not make any changes to the GPO.

 


July 12, 2004

Senator Carper's response letter

to passing H.R. 218

 FYI... This is a letter of response to my urging Senator's Carper, Biden and Representative Castle to support the H.R. 218, the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, that would allow Active Police Officers and qualified Retired Police Officers in good standing, to carry concealed weapons anywhere in the US.

 This is Sen. Carper's letter to me......

 

July 12, 2004

Mr. Michael Riley

Wilmington, Delaware  19808

 Dear Mr. Riley:

 Thank you for contacting my office to express your continued

support for H.R. 218, the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act.

As a cosponsor of the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, I am

pleased to let you know that the Senate unanimously approved

H.R. 218 last week.

 

I have a great deal of admiration and appreciation for law

enforcement personnel.  My father worked most of his life as a

claims adjuster for Nationwide Insurance, and he had the

opportunity to interact with law enforcement officers throughout

his career in the insurance industry.  During that time, he gained a

great deal of respect for those men and women who were willing to

risk their lives every day for their fellow citizens.  Having an

appreciation for law enforcement is just one of my father's values

that I carry with me to this day.

 

Having said that, I am pleased to report that the Senate

unanimously approved H.R. 218, the Law Enforcement Officers

Safety Act, on July 7th.   As you know, H.R. 218 will exempt off-

duty and retired law enforcement officials from state laws

prohibiting concealed weapons.  In order to qualify to carry

concealed weapons, officers will have to maintain firearms training

and carry proof of affiliation with a law enforcement agency.

Moreover, the legislation will require retired law enforcement

personnel to meet standards for carrying guns within the past year.

President Bush has indicated that he will sign the Law

Enforcement Officers Safety Act in the near future.

 

I have been a strong supporter of the Law Enforcement Officers

Safety Act since its introduction at the beginning of the 108th

Congress.  I cosponsored the Senate version of the legislation,

S.253, and voted for it as an amendment to a subsequently defeated

Senate gun liability bill.  It is clear to me that the measure will

enable more trained law enforcement officers to enforce the law

and respond to any crisis.  It will also undoubtedly help our nation

guard against the threat of terrorism.

 

As one who has a great deal of respect for our law enforcement

personnel, I know that current and former police officers are rarely,

if ever, "off duty".   The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act is a

common sense initiative that will simply make our communities

safer.  Ultimately, the federal government has a responsibility to

continue to give law enforcement officials the tools they need to

protect our nation.

 

Thank you again for contacting my office.  Please do not hesitate

to contact me in the future about matters of importance to you.

 

With best personal regards, I am

 

 Sincerely,

 Thomas R. Carper

 

For more information please visit my web site at http://carper.senate.gov

 

 

DELAWARE FOP LICENSE PLATES AVAILABLE

Delaware's Division of Motor Vehicles has the below listed Specialty Plate Numbers available to register.

Please obtain a form

and along with your check made out to

DELAWARE STATE FOP

$25.00 for the first tag ($10.00 for each additional tag)

All of these forms must be submit through your FOP Lodge Trustee

( for verification of being in good standing),

Your Lodge Trustee will then forward the form

to

 

DELAWARE STATE LODGE 

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE

Image by FlamingText.com

Office of the Secretary

324 5th Ave

Wilmington, DE 19805

  fop@allanticbb.net

 

  • The FOP member must have his/her name on the title.

  • Specialty Plates are only given to those vehicles with "hard metal" tags. Cardboard TEMP tags will not be accepted, so wait until you get your hard tags issued to you before applying.

  • It is recommended that an applicant pick three desired numbers in case one is being processed for someone else.

  • The Delaware State Lodge Secretary shall only issue a Delaware FOP tag application if that member pays membership dues to a local Delaware lodge.

  • If the member leaves the Order, the FOP Specialty tag must be surrendered to DMV.

  • Delaware Law states that a vehicle may display only one Vanity Tag on a vehicle. (For example, you cannot have a FOP Special Tag and a U. of  Del. Special Tag on the same vehicle)

 

The following plate numbers are presently available:

267-299--315-325-412-438-454 -456 -458-461 -470 - 474-486- - 503 - 507 - 508 - 509 -514-516-- 519 - 523 - 526 - 527 - 530 - 531 - 532 - 537 - 538 - 539 - 540 - 542 - 545 - 546 - 547 - 548 - 549 -553-556 - 557 - 558-559 - 561 - 563 - 564 - 565 - 566 - 568 - 571 - 572 - 575 - 576 - 577 - 578 - 579 - 580 - 581 - 582 - 583 - 584 -  590 - 591 - 592 - 593 - 594 -  596 - 597 - 598 - 599 - - 604 - 606 - 608 - 609 - 610 - 613 - 615 - 616 - 618 -- 627-634- - 628 -636- 637 - 638 - 639 - 640 - 641 - 642 -644- 645 - 646 - 647 - 648 - 649 - 650 - 651 - 652 - 653 - 654 - 655 - 656 -- 659 - 660 - 661 - 662 - 663 - 664 - 665 -667- 670 - 671 - 672 - 674 - 675 -- 677 - 678 - 680 - 681 - 682 - 683 - 684 - 685 - 686 - 687 - 688 - 689 - 693 --695 - 698 - 699 -700-706- 708 - 709 - 712 - 713 - 715 -717- 718 - 719 - 720 - 721 - 723 - 725 - 727 - 729 - 730 - 732 - 733 - 734 - 735 - 736 - 737 - 739 - 740 - 741 - 742 - 743 - 744 - 745 - 746 - 749 - 750 - 751 - 752 - 753 - 754 - 755 - 756 - 757 - 758 - 759 - 760 - 761 - 762 - 763 - 764 - 766 - 767 - 768 - 771 - 772 - 775-776 - 778 - 780 - 781 - 782 - 783 - 784 - 786 - 787 - 788 - 789 - 790 - 791 - 792 - 793 - 794 - 795 - 796 - 797 - 798 - 799 - 804 - 805 - 806 - 808 - 809 - 810 - 811 - 812 - 814 - 815 - 816 -- 818 - 819 - 820 -824 - 825 - 827 - 828 - 829 - 830 - 831 - 832 - 833 - 834 - 835 - 836 - 837 - 840 - 841 - 842 - 843 - 844 - 845 - 846 - 847 - 848 - 849 - 851 - 852 - 853 - 854 - 855 - 857 - 858 - 859 - 860 - 861 - 862 - 863 -865 - 866 - 867 - 870 - 871 - 872 - 873 - 874 - 875 - 876 - 877- 878 - 880 - 882 - 883 - 884 - 885 - 886  -887- 890 - - 895 - 896 - 897 -898-899-- 902 - 903 - 904 - 906 - 908 - 909 - 912-913 - 916 -- 922 - 925-930-931 - 932 - 933 - 934 - 935 - 937 - 938 - 939 -  943 - 944 - 945 - 946 - 947 - 948 - 949 - 950 - 954 - 955 - 964 - 965 - 966 - 967 - 968 - 969 - 970 - 972 - 973 - 974 - 976 -- 978 - 979 -980- 981 - 982 - 983 - 985 - 986 - 987 - 988 - 990 - 991 - 992 - 995 - 996-997

NEWS FLASH - JULY 1ST, 2003

Local State of Delaware issue

The General Assembly finished their session in the early hours of July 1st, 2003. The State Lodge Legislative Committee was there, working for the membership. Spearheaded by Legislative Chairman Larry Mitchell and joined by brother's Bill Jopp, Carl McIlroy and myself, the State Lodge had House Bill 283 passed in the Senate and sent to the Governor. This bill removes the sunset provision from the Binding Arbitration Act (March 31st, 2004).

 

This bill was just introduced in the House on June 26th, passed that same day and forwarded to the Senate. The speed in which this was accomplished caught our opponents off guard, and prevented them from mounting any opposition.

 
Another important piece of legislation accomplished was the Tuition/Technology Funding in the Bond Bill (HB 300). The language from our bill was included in the Bond Bill and a million dollars was allocated ($900k for tech. and $100k for tuition reimbursement).
 
This concludes a five year effort by Brother Mitchell and myself, along with others from the State Lodge, to secure some type of tuition assistance for our membership. I am very thankful to the Honorable Representative Bill Oberle for his leadership on both these issues. Once again, Brother Oberle led the way. 
 
Bob Jameson
State Lodge President

 

Education Reimbursement Guidelines

 

1.      Must be certified as a police officer or other law enforcement officer as defined in Del.C.1911(a) or a State of Delaware Probation and Parole Officer employed by the Department of Corrections.

  1. Must be employed full time in the State of Delaware.

  2. Reimbursement will be made for the cost of tuition to an in state college or university at the following rate:

·        100% for undergraduate studies

·        50% for graduate studies

 

4.   Approved courses of study shall be classes related to the following:

·        Corrections

·        Public Safety

·        Criminal Justice

·        Computer Science

·        Psychology

·        Sociology

·        Education

·        Those courses necessary to complete a degree program in any of the above mentioned fields

 

5.   Reimbursement will be limited to one (1) class per term/grading period

  1. The Criminal Justice Council will accept “letters of intent to enroll” from officers on the following dates:

    1. July 15 – August 15 for all Fall Term

    2. November 15 – December 15 for the Winter or Spring Term

    3. April 15 – May 15 for the Summer Term

 

The letters should identify the class that will be taken and the cost of the class. Letters will be accepted on a “first come, first served” basis and will continue to be accepted until all of the allotted funds are obligated.

            Officers will receive notification of their acceptance or denial due to lack of funds.

            An Officer who is denied reimbursement due to lack of funds will have his letter remain on file with the Criminal Justice Council in the event that funds do become available.

            An officer who is approved for reimbursement shall notify the Criminal Justice Council in the event of his/her decision not to enroll in the class or their early termination.

7.      Once the course is completed, the officer will file an Application for Reimbursement form with the Criminal Justice Council and attach a copy of the receipt for payment of tuition and a copy of his/her transcript documenting his/her having received a grade of at least C or a 2.0 on a 4.0 scale for the course for which he/she is seeking reimbursement.

  1. The request for reimbursement shall be filed within thirty (30) days of completion of the course

  2. An officer who is denied reimbursement shall have the right to appeal. The appeal will be filed within thirty (30) days of denial of the reimbursement to the Law Enforcement Education Committee. There can be no appeal on the denial of benefits due to lack of funds.

  3. Any officer who is terminated from law enforcement employment and who has previously received reimbursement within the last twelve (12) months shall immediately become ineligible to receive education benefits and shall repay all tuition reimbursements previously extended to the employee, including interest on a pro-rata basis. The Attorney General’s Office shall calculate the amount of repay and make the arrangement for repayment. Policies regarding termination, resignation, retirement and re-certification of the Council of Police Training will serve as guidelines in determining repayment.

  4. A committee, hereinafter referred to as the Law Enforcement Education Committee, will serve as an appeals board and to address and all issues regarding the Law Enforcement Education Reimbursement Fund that are yet to be identified. The committee shall consist of the following:

    1. Executive Director of the Criminal Justice Council or his/her designee

    2. Chairman of the Delaware Police Chief’s Council or his/her designee

    3. President of the Fraternal Order of Police or his/her designee

    4. President of the Delaware State Trooper’s Association or his/her designee

    5. A representative from the State Budget Office

The Secretary of the State Department of Education or his/her designee

 

 

 

Social Security Issues:

 

We, the members of the Fraternal Order of Police, local and National Lodges, support:

 

 

#1        H.R. 594/S. 349, the "Social Security Fairness Act"   - Repeals both the "Windfall Elimination Provision" (WEP) and the "Government Pension Offset" (GPO).

 

 

#2        H.R. 664/S. 611, the "Government Pension Offset Reform Act"  - Which would amend the GPO provision in current law.

 

 

#3        H.R. 848, the "Social Security Benefits Restoration Act"  -  Would repeal the  “Windfall Elimination Provision”

 

#4        H.R. 4391, “Public Servant Retirement Protection Act,” This would repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and replace it with a more equitable, individualized calculation of Social Security benefits.

 

 

 

                                       GrassRoots Program Logo*
 

 

   History     Contact  Us   Grand Lodge    NLEOMF     Members    Mission      Home

Last Update: Sunday May 04, 2008
Problems or Suggestions please contact:  Webmaster: Buddy Williamson